Archive for the 'Business Excellence' Category

Your competitive advantage

:en:Seth GodinImage via Wikipedia

Another brilliant gem from Seth Godin:

People are fickle, but we’re generally rational. When someone makes a choice (hiring, firing, choosing a vendor, buying a soda) they’re using some sort of internal logic and reasoning to support that choice.

As a marketer, you win when they choose you.

So, why choose you?

The answer to that question is your competitive advantage. What makes it likely that more than a few rational people will consider their options and choose you or your company or your organization?

Truth: It’s rarely a computerized cost/benefit analysis. Instead, it’s a human choice.

Competitive advantage is similar to a concept we Product Managers call “Distinctive Competence” and it is a fundamental building block of any business. Those who don’t define it (early), wander aimlessly in search of customers, revenue and success.

, ,

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sphere: Related Content

The new way of Getting Things Done

Gudjon Mar Gudjonsson, has written an interesting post on his blog about networked productivity.

There are many great resources out there on the holy grail of productivity and time management. One popular method is the Getting Things Done (GTD) method from David Allen.

GTD is a work-life management system and book by David Allen that attempts to free us from a vast workload and instead operate an integrated system of stress-free productivity.

I like GTD but it can be improved. In this post I talk about a new layer to the GTD framework that I believe adds the strength of network collaboration as well; a kind of socialising layer.

I will call this the Open layer thus the methodology is Getting Things Done Open (GTDO).

Here is the post:  The new way of Getting Things Done

Sphere: Related Content

Randy Pausch, author of The Last Lecture, has died.

Randy Pausch, the Carnegie Mellon University computer science professor whose final lecture inspired millions, has died of pancreatic cancer. Dr. Pausch, 47, who turned the lecture into a book, said that no one would have been interested in his words of wisdom were he not a man in his 40s with a terminal illness.

For any of you that missed Dr. Pausch’s Last Lecture, here it is:

YouTube Preview Image

More about Dr. Pausch.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Pausch

read more | digg story

Sphere: Related Content

iPhone 3G Launch — Frustrations of a loyal Apple customer

Where to begin? Do I begin with the 4 hours waiting in lines at two Apple stores, the lack of pre-sale information from Apple, the friendly and well meaning, but essentially non-helpful Apple store employees, the unfriendly, unhelpful and annoying AT&T retail employees, the constantly changing information about iPhone 3G inventories, the useless Apple retail website?

I can’t think of many ways Apple and AT&T could have bungled the iPhone 3G launch more than they did. And in doing so, they are alienating the very loyal customers they need to be successful. I am certainly not alone, the WSJ blogged about the launch calling it “chaos”.  I couldn’t agree more. Let me explain…

I went to the Apple store @Bellevue Square mall on Friday with colleagues from work (both interested in the iPhone 3G) during our lunch break, only to find a line I was told was about 4 hours long. We checked with the AT&T store at the mall to find they had sold out within the first hour. The AT&T store only received about 40 units.

Later that afternoon, I went to another Apple Store (UVillage in Seattle) where the line was about 2 hours. It turns out the line was closer to 4 hours because the employees assisting with iPhone activations were beginning to go home and the processing rate was cut in half. I was initially informed there were plenty of iPhones and everyone in line would get one. About 10 minutes later a different Apple employee came out and told us they were runnning low on 16GB Black iPhones and probably wouldn’t have sufficient for everyone in line. About every 20 minutes a friendly Apple employee would come out and give us an update. Each time, we heard a slightly different story, and the Apple employees were careful not to deviate from script–they politely declined to answer questions like–How many iPhones are left? How many people are working on sales/activation? Will you run out of model X, Y or Z? At various times, an employee would come out and tell us that model X was low (usually 16 GB Black), the next employee would say, “No, we have model X, but Y is low”, the next would say, “X and Y are fine, but Z is running low” ?!? Each encounter left those of us in line scratching our heads, but we were all hopeful we would still be able to purchase our desired model. After 2.5 hours, a manager came out to inform us that the 16 GB Black model had sold out. I left.

The next morning, I got up early to get back to the Bellevue Square Apple store. At 10:30 (30 minutes after opening), the line had already grown to two hours. We were assured that they supplies looked good and that they were processing new activations as quickly as possible. The line wasn’t moving. When we asked why, we were told that there were fewer employees working on iPhones that day (day 2) so we should expect delays. Behind me the line continued to grow. At one point, an Apple employee came out and told those at the very back of the line (20+ people and 1 hour behind) that the 16 GB models were running low. When she came toward us, we asked about supplies and were told, we would be fine. The line continued to move slowly. After 2 hours, I was number 20 in line. At that point, an Apple manager came out and told us, they were out of 16 GB Black iPhones. I left.

Whenever we asked about inventories, we were repeatedly told, “We don’t know how many we have, we can’t count them”. Why not? How hard would it have been to count to 50, 100, 150? How hard would it have been to hand out a card with the desired model based on actual inventory? While I appreciated the bottled water and snacks, I wondered why go the extra mile to alienate customers by witholding information they can use to decided whether or not to stay in line.

Until this weekend, I was a very happy and loyal Apple customer. I have 6 (yes, 6–and trust me, they all serve a useful and necessary purpose) Apple computers at home. I have evangelized Apple computers, at the company I co-founded, for over 5 years. I even used a PowerBook G4 and MacBook Pro while I was working for Siemens–an all Windows shop (~450,000 employees in the Active Directory GAL–one of the largest in the world). At the startup where I am currently working, we use Apple computers exclusively (except for Linux servers). In addition to the 6 Macs, we have two iPhones, an AppleTV, a Time Capsule, and 4 Airport Expresses. Additionally, in the past 7 years, I have owned two additional Macs (sold them on eBay), and Apple software and countless Apple accessories. I mention all of this simplly to say–I think I qualify as a good Apple customer.

As for AT&T, we have a family plan ($149/mo plus extra texting) with two iPhones and an additional user. Unlimited texting for one iPhone, and the additional phone. Additionally, I have an AT&T 3G card for my MacBook Pro ($60/month). I think we also qualify as a good AT&T customer.

So, why do Apple and AT&T treat me like a “new” customer?

They treat me like a new customer by forcing me to stand in line at their stores with no guarantee that I will be able to purchase the latest object of my desire. By doing this, they risk alienating a long-term customer, fan and evangelist. Seth Godin recently blogged about this in a post entitled “Scarcity“. He addressed this specific issue. He says,

The danger is that you can kill long-term loyalty. You can annoy your best customers. You can spread negative word of mouth. You can train people to hate your scarcity strategy (Apple did all four this weekend).

The problem is that our kneejerk way of dealing with scarcity is to treat everyone the same and to have people ‘pay’ by spending time to indicate their desire.

Waiting in line is a very old-school way of dealing with scarcity. And treating new customers like old customers, treating unknown customers the same as high-value customers is painful and unnecessary.

So, Apple knew the iPhone 3G would be a hot item. To think that the Apple and AT&T marketing groups may have conspired to create even more “scarcity” to drive additional sales makes the pain they subjected their best customers to this weekend even more incredible.

Seth goes on to talk about 5 principles on managing the relationship with your best customers.

Principle 1: Use the internet to form a queue. If you have a scarce product, you almost certainly know it’s scarce in advance. Instead of taxing customers by wasting their time, reward the early shoppers by taking orders online. A month before sale date, for example, tell them it’s coming. If you sell out before ship date, that’s great, because next time people will be even quicker to order when they hear about what you’ve got. (And you can do this in the real world, too–postcards with numbers or even playing cards work just fine.)A hot band that regularly sells out on the road, for example, could put a VIP serial number inside every CD or t-shirt they sell. Use that to pre-order your tix.

Principle 2: Give the early adopters a reward. In the case of Apple, I would have made the first 100,000 phones a different color. Then, instead of the buyer being a hero for ten seconds, he gets to be a hero for a year.

Principle 3: Treat different customers differently. Apple, for example, knows how to contact every single existing customer. Why not offer VIP status to big spenders? Or to those that make a lot of calls? Let them cut the line. It’s not fair? What’s fair mean? I can’t think of anything more fair than treating the people who treat you well, better.

Principle 4: When things happen in real time, you’re way more likely to screw up. One of the giant advantages of the Net is that you can fix things before the whole world notices. Try to do your rollout in small sections, so you can fix mistakes before you hurt the very people you’re trying to embrace.

Principle 5: Give your early adopters a forum to celebrate. A place to brag or demonstrate or show off or share insights and ideas. Amplify the heroes, which is far better than amplifying the pain of standing in line.

Imagine what the Apple and AT&T stores would have been like this weekend if they were filled with happy customers who had pre-paid, pre-registered and were just dropping in for three minutes to pick up their (very coveted) phones, walking up the VIP line, past all the others just waiting for a chance to buy one…

Imagine…

Oh, and I still don’t have my 16 GB Black iPhone 3G. I finally resorted to ordering it through an AT&T store–although they aren’t sure if I will get it in 3 days or a month!

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Sphere: Related Content

Gin, Television and Social Surplus

Clay Shirky, author of Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations, has posted on what he calls the “social surplus” or the time we gain by participating in the culture versus just sitting back and watching it pass by pursuing activities like watching TV.

Clay specifically cites TV, and singles outs sitcoms, as a sort of glue holding society together as we transitioned from the Industrial Revolution to post WWII society with higher GDP per capita, better life expectancy and more free time. Now imagine if all that time spent watching TV could be put to use and benefit of society–the social surplus.

Shirkey’s back of the napkin stats are compelling

So how big is that surplus? So if you take Wikipedia as a kind of unit, all of Wikipedia, the whole project–every page, every edit, every talk page, every line of code, in every language that Wikipedia exists in–that represents something like the cumulation of 100 million hours of human thought. I worked this out with Martin Wattenberg at IBM; it’s a back-of-the-envelope calculation, but it’s the right order of magnitude, about 100 million hours of thought.
And television watching? Two hundred billion hours, in the U.S. alone, every year. Put another way, now that we have a unit, that’s 2,000 Wikipedia projects a year spent watching television. Or put still another way, in the U.S., we spend 100 million hours every weekend, just watching the ads. This is a pretty big surplus.

That is huge. Think of it another way,

this is the other thing about the size of the cognitive surplus we’re talking about. It’s so large that even a small change could have huge ramifications. Let’s say that everything stays 99 percent the same, that people watch 99 percent as much television as they used to, but 1 percent of that is carved out for producing and for sharing. The Internet-connected population watches roughly a trillion hours of TV a year. That’s about five times the size of the annual U.S. consumption. One per cent of that is 100 Wikipedia projects per year worth of participation.

Time to turn off the TV and start participating…

Sphere: Related Content

Hello, gorgeous! Meet the laptop you’ll use in 2015

I found a very interesting Computerworld article:

A lot has changed in the 20 years since the first laptop computers appeared, including gigahertz processors, color screens, optical drives and wireless data. However, one thing that has stubbornly stayed the same is the conventional clamshell format with its hinged display lid that opens to reveal a mechanical keyboard.

That’s about to change. The rules of notebook design and the components that go inside are being rewritten to make the road a better place to work and play.

The CPU’s front-side bus will likely disappear by 2015. The bus acts like a traffic cop, sending data to the different parts of the system at a slower speed than the computational core. In its place will be an integrated controller that makes this distribution of data much more efficient by operating faster.

Currently, adding 64GB of solid state capacity to a notebook’s hard drive runs an extra $1,000. By 2015, the typical mainstream notebook could be outfitted with a 2TB hard disk drive, which should be plenty of room for even the biggest data hog, the experts speculated. For smaller and lighter machines, look to having something like 250GB of flash memory at your disposal, but it will likely come at a small premium.

read more | digg story

Sphere: Related Content

DRM, Digital Content, and the Consumer Experience: Lessons Learned From The Music Industry

Sphere: Related Content

12 Learnings From My First Turn As Startup CEO

Jason Goldberg, founder and former CEO of Jobster (now vice-chairman) has put together one of the best lists of learnings I have ever seen on leading a startup. It is well organized, thoughtful, and clearly is borne out of experience–the kind you get by making mistakes, learning and moving on.

Although, I wouldn’t exclude any of them, here are a couple of my favorites:

  • The CEO’s job is to create value.
  • Technology companies are all about the product. Getting the product right is critical before aggressively going to market.
  • the rapid iteration model (ship early, learn from usage, adjust) works well for consumer services but works not as well for B2B services. Consumers will let you learn with them over time. Paying business customers, however, have less patience for your learning on their dime.
  • You must get close to your users and customers and live their personas.
  • Hire people who are passionate about the specific problems you are trying to solve.
  • The value of your company is directly related to your capital efficiency. Spend every dollar like it is equity. Preserve cash! Preserve cash! Preserve cash!
  • Have fun.

You can read the full post here.

Sphere: Related Content

The trouble with Steve Jobs

A friend of mine pointed me to an interesting article about the personality traits/flaws of Steve Jobs and the impact, both real and imagined on the stockholders of Apple (for purposes of disclosure, I am a stockholder). The article is worth reading and raises several issues germane to the issue of disclosure to shareholders. The core issue is summarized in the prologue:

Jobs likes to make his own rules, whether the topic is computers, stock options, or even pancreatic cancer. The same traits that make him a great CEO drive him to put his company, and his investors, at risk.

My reaction is typical of these pieces. The author, Peter Elkind, is a typical investigative journalist who has never sat behind a desk as an executive of a publicly traded company and endured the kind scrutiny he forces on others. He of course, has the advantage of hindsight to assist him as he passes judgment on decisions made by executives with less than perfect information.

It will be interesting to see if Jobs in another case of a celebrity (in this case a celebrity executive) built up by the media only to be torn down. I guess this would be the second time for Jobs.

read more | digg story

Sphere: Related Content

End of the line for Netscape

It is hard to say goodbye. I don’t remember the date, but I still remember the first time I saw or used a web browser exactly. I know it was NCSA Mosaic running on a UNIX box in a computer lab at BYU. Having been an avid Compuserve users (and trying AOL) I do remember thinking, this thing is going to change the world. I wish I had known how. For those of you as nostalgic for cyberculture, here is some more history about Mosaic (from Wikipedia).

Scholars consider Mosaic to be the web browser which led to the Internet boom of the 1990s. Robert Reid underscores this importance stating, “while still an undergraduate, Marc wrote the Mosaic software … that made the web popularly relevant and touched off the revolution” (p.xlii). Reid notes that Andreessen’s team hoped:

to rectify many of the shortcomings of the very primitive prototypes then floating around the Internet. Most significantly, their work transformed the appeal of the Web from niche uses in the technical area to mass-market appeal. In particular, these University of Illinois students made two key changes to the Web browser, which hyper-boosted its appeal: they added graphics to what was otherwise boring text-based software, and, most importantly [sic], they ported the software from so-called Unix computers that are popular only in technical and academic circles, to the Microsoft Windows operating system, which is used on more than 80 percent of the computers in the world, especially personal and commercial computers. (p.xxv).

There is more history of the Netscape browser and the company.

Also, evolt.org has a browser archive with almost every known version of every browser ever released. You must check it out. I think I am going to download Mosaic and try to run it on XP under Parallels on my MacBook Pro (is that legal?).

read more | digg story

Sphere: Related Content